Menzerna Question

Discussion in 'Compounds, Polishes, Paint Cleaners, and Glazes' started by SBDinATL, Oct 7, 2008.

  1. SBDinATL

    SBDinATL Virgin Detailer

    What is the difference in Intensive Polish PO91E and Super Intensive Polish PO83/PO85RD3.02?

    Other than working on CeramiClear for SIP is the level of correction the same?
     
  2. Buddy

    Buddy Getting to know Detailing

    Yes, You are correct on there scale they are both at 3.5 for cut and 3 for gloss :thumb:
     
  3. slanguage

    slanguage OD On Detailing

    I think the SIP is a little more workable and I believe it finishes down a tad better, but don't quote me on that. Maybe Phil or another Pro will chime in.
     
  4. detaildoc

    detaildoc Guest

    I find that SIP cuts a lot faster and also has more bite than IP, especially when used on conventional cc. I've been able to remove scratches with SIP that IP did not.
     
  5. Buddy

    Buddy Getting to know Detailing

    Thanks for adding to this post. All I could go by was the chart and I wanted to help...:thumb:
     
  6. eShine

    eShine Guest

    SIP has twice the amount of cutting powder in it to make it work quicker. It was designed to cut quicker but finish the same.
     
  7. kenny1775

    kenny1775 Jedi Nuba

    I have a feeling SIP is going to be next on my "buy it" list :thumb:
     
  8. SBDinATL

    SBDinATL Virgin Detailer

    Thanks!
     
  9. scheerspeed

    scheerspeed DB Forum Supporter

    i find that IP dusts a LOT more than SIP
     
  10. Buddy

    Buddy Getting to know Detailing

    Now you tell me. I just bought a new quart of IP. :yikes::yikes::yikes:
     
  11. Dream Machines

    Dream Machines Jedi Nuba

    On non ceramiclears, 91L has better cut but SIP finishes down better

    Though of course cars that we dont see in Australia like american cars, may have the SIP cut better than 91L
     

Share This Page