Guys, I did a demo last Saturday on a 2003 Frontier Crew Cab. The owner decided to tackle a few stains with a scotch brite pad and wants to repair/lessen the scratches. I managed to remove 70-80% of these sratches on my test spot with D300/M101 and Meg's MF pads (tons of pressure). The owner scheduled a detail session as soon as he saw the test spot results. I was wondering if it would be better (and faster) to wet-stand these areas before hitting them with a compound. IMO, the scotch brite scratches are equivalent to 1000-1500 grit. The paint readings are healthy (average 150 microns ... never been buffed) and the paint looks excellent for being 9 years old. I was thinking about hitting them with 2000 grit and then 3000 grit before compounding. Should follow this plan or just go straight to compounding? Other suggestions?
Ken ... should I wet-sand in the opposite direction of the scotch brite marks to lessen the appearance of the deeper scratches? On some of the spots, he sanded in a circular motion. Thanks for the help.
1500 grit, then compound, forget the 3000 unless you really want to, I did the same on a Honda Accord a lady used scotch brite pad on hood to remove bugs/bird poop.
Thanks for the advice junebug ... i was able to remove the scratches without sanding. They were lighter than what I though. MF pads D300/M101 mix did the trick. Came out great.
Thanks for following up G! in the OP you mentioned that only 70-80% of it came out with D300 and M101 How did it differ in the rest of he correction such that you didn't need to sand?
I was able to fully repair most of the affected areas. There were 2 or 3 areas where some RIDS still remained, but they were really faint. I didn't go further because I didn't want to compromise the clear thickness. The color (light metallic beige) helped a lot. Overall, I was able to achieve 80% correction on the entire vehicle. I didn't touch the tailgate because I got paint readings of 60-70 microns, Everything else got a 2-step.